In addition to New Zealand, Australia, the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom (Five Eyes), India and Japan have announced support for end-to-end encryption this week, but only if there is a legal way to access that information. I will.
Signatories of each country, including New Zealand’s Minister of Justice and Minister Andrew Little, who is in charge of both GCSB and SIS, say that encryption is an “existing anchor of trust in the digital world” and countries should not seek the next method: Is declared. Exploit that security.
Instead, there must essentially be legitimate backdoors that law enforcement agencies can use to crack down on illegal content-as long as these backdoors have adequate safeguards and surveillance.
They argue that encryption can make public security enforcement difficult, especially when it comes to serious problems such as child exploitation.
They cite a survey from the WePROTECT Global Alliance (a coalition of countries, technology companies and civil society companies). It claims that public social media and communication platforms are the most commonly used ways to care for and meet children online.
The WePROTECT Global Alliance 2019 Global Threat Assessment states that the US Open’s Missing and Exploited Children’s Center used Facebook Messenger in approximately 12 million of the 18.4 million reports of child sexual abuse in 2018. Claims to have found.
“Measures to enhance privacy, including end-to-end encryption, should not be taken at the expense of child safety,” the signer said.
As a result, the industry needs to rethink encryption that blocks all sorts of legitimate access to content.
They believe that technology companies and service providers should also be responsible for detecting and responding to breaches, especially with respect to the most serious illegal content such as exploitation, abuse, violent crime and terrorist activity.
They argue that encryption undermines these responsibilities and prevents law enforcement agencies from accessing content when it is legal and necessary.
This is not a new stance-in July 2019, Five Eyes countries provide access to data in a “readable and usable format” to governments where tech companies are acting with appropriate legal authority. Highly recommended to-all encourage user safety and take action against illegal content.
Signatories say they are working to develop “reasonable” ways to protect privacy, enable innovation, protect human rights and protect cybersecurity.
They also said that public security did not have to compromise on these values, and added that it was possible to protect them with the help of the industry.
There are several important ways to suggest that legal encryption can be implemented.
- Incorporate public safety into system design, enabling businesses to act effectively against illegal content and activities without compromising security, facilitating criminal investigation and prosecution, and protecting vulnerable people To do.
- Allows law enforcement agencies to access readable and usable form of content that is legally issued, necessary and proportional, and subject to strong safeguards and surveillance.And
- In consultation with governments and other stakeholders, promote legitimate access in a way that truly influences substantive and design decisions.
“Cryptography is essential and needs to protect privacy and cybersecurity, but at the expense of completely eliminating the ability of law enforcement and the tech industry itself to counter the most serious illegal content and activities online. Must not be. “
The signatories are:
- New Zealand Minister of Justice, GCSB Minister of Justice, NZSIS Minister of Justice Andrew Little
- Australian Interior Minister Peter Dutton
- United States Attorney General, William P. Barr
- British Home Secretary, Priti Patel
- Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Response, Canada
Five Eyes countries want legitimate access to backdoors to combat “illegal content”
Source link Five Eyes countries want legitimate access to backdoors to combat “illegal content”