Working from home seems to be on the minds of Victorians this week. Latrobe University scholars were interviewed in the media about their research. study for working from home (WFH) Focuses on the most commonly reported adverse health effects during the 2020 lockdown. In another contribution, her liberal Melbourne Municipal Councilor and barrister Roshena Campbell argued at this masthead about her work from home: The risk of creating new class disparities.
Mr Campbell’s article was a response to Victorian Prime Minister Daniel Andrews saying that working from home would be “permanent”. Apparently, this is not a good thing. Central business districts will suffer from declining foot traffic. Campbell is concerned about productivity, and while he hasn’t gone so far as to accuse workers of lying in productivity surveys, he seems to believe that public officials go beyond the means of measuring productivity. is.
But rhetoric aside, telecommuting is a middle-class privilege, a cheek-and-chin solidarity of white- and blue-collar workers crammed like pilchards onto streetcars en route to industrial workplaces in big cities. The main problem is that it removes the . smoke.
This ignores the fact that work has been done in many different environments over the centuries. Despite the fact that before the Industrial Revolution most work was done at or near home, there were always differences. Some got their hands dirty, while others only had to worry about ink stains. Some earned frequent horse and cart points on the Crusades, while others struggled on land.
Telecommuting can be extended to a variety of roles as executives get imaginative and embrace it. Sure, you may need someone to physically deliver your daily foie gras, but your customer contact person can handle your order while you work from home.
it takes me to interesting study A paper by Professor Jodi Oakman and her team, which surveyed nearly 1,000 workers mainly in Victoria in 2020, has been published in BMJ Open.
The data was collected while the Victorian lockdown was in effect, requiring 342 of the participants with children to watch for small ticks at the same time. So this was her WFH in its very extreme form.
The team reported several negative effects that varied by gender, including work-family conflicts and problems such as neck pain and stress. There were other factors, such as worrying about losing.
Working from home is now
Source link Working from home is now